Choices for My CCR's Animation and Audience Engagement

My main goal as I start to prepare my critical creative reflection (CCR) is to use unique ways to convey my opinion to my audience. I had to do some in-depth research of different animation methods, such as AI and normal animation, which are my main choices as of now.

One of my first steps was to study animation. To better understand the benefits and drawbacks of both AI and normal animation, I investigated some sources, such as blogs and YouTube classes. My research gave me important knowledge about the technical and creative advantages of each method.

Mostly, this channel will help me with editing.

I would benefit from this one because of the more natural motions and animation methods.

On the other hand, this channel would be useful to me regarding AI animation.

For example, the quickness and efficacy of AI animation apps such as Adobe Character Animator and Cartoon Animator are perks. With the help of such tools, I can create creative and fluid figures with little work. Being able to quickly make changes and modifications is another benefit of AI animation, which is important in improving the visual aspects of my CCR.
Traditional animation, on the other hand, offers a classic and handcrafted look but takes more time. Because of the hard frame-by-frame process, more control over the little details of a character's emotion and motion can be gained. This method works well for developing a unique visual style that may have an important effect on the viewer.

I chose to test both approaches to see which one would work best for my CCR. Using AI techniques, I could produce short animated sequences that I could compare to hand-drawn animations. I could get feedback on these samples overall. The feedback would be helpful.